Matt Rammelkamp's Blog

Personal blog of Matthew Rammelkamp from 2005 - 2009. Blog is now changing sites to

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

We Are Change Long Island

Join We Are Change Long Island

Support 9-11 Truth, Fight the New World Order, sign-up to learn how to get involved:

Monday, February 25, 2008

Conspiracy of Silence & The Franklin Cover-Up

Conspiracy of Silence & The Franklin Cover-Up

Conspiracy of Silence, a documentary listed for viewing in TV Guide Magazine was to be aired on the Discovery Channel, on May 3 1994. This documentary exposed a network of religious leaders and Washington politicians who flew children to Washington D.C. for sex orgies. Many children suffered the indignity of wearing nothing but their underwear and a number displayed on a piece of cardboard hanging from their necks when being auctioned off to foreigners in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Toronto, Canada. At the last minute before airing, unknown congressmen threatened the TV Cable industry with restrictive legislation if this documentary was aired. Almost immediately, the rights to the documentary were purchased by unknown persons who ordered all copies destroyed.

A copy of this videotape was furnished anonymously to former Nebraska state senator and attorney John De Camp who made it available to retired FBI Agent Ted L. Gunderson. While the video quality is not top grade, this tape is a blockbuster in what is revealed by its participants involved.

This information is important to us today because while we all go out and fight for our causes, we are doing so not knowing that this activity is still happening under all our noses.

Go to and search for "Conspiracy of Silence" to watch.

NOTE: This is the "sugar coated" version - for even deeper down the rabbit hole - read the BOOK "The Franklin Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska" by Senator John W. Decamp

Saturday, February 16, 2008

The Council on Foreign Relations and The New World Order

The Council on Foreign Relations and The New World Order
By William Blase
of The Courier

For those who may be confused by the controversies surrounding the "New World Order", a One-World-Government, and American concern over giving the UN more power; those unaware of the issues involved; and those wishing more background, I offer the following.

Originally presented for an Honors Class, "Dilemmas of War and Peace," at New Mexico State University, the paper was ridiculed and characterized by Dr. Yosef Lapid, (an acknowledged and locally quoted "expert" on Terrorism and Middle Eastern affairs) as "paranoid... possibly a symptom of mental illness." You may judge for yourself.

Citing source data is the "scientific method," but does not seem to apply to "Conspiracy Theories." A thousand sources may be quoted, yet will not convince the "skeptics," the "realists." It seems to me the "symptoms of mental illness" are on their side, if they refuse to look at evidence ("There are none so blind as those who WILL not see"); or perhaps something more sinister is at work, such as a knowledge of the truth, that does not want YOU to know.

To be paranoid means to believe in delusions of danger and persecution. If the danger is real, and the evidence credible, then it cannot be delusional. To ignore the evidence, and hope that it CANNOT be true, is more an evidence of mental illness.

The issue involves much more than a difference of philosophy, or political viewpoint. Growing up in the midst of the "Cold War," our generation were taught that those who attempted to abolish our national sovereignty and overthrow our Constitutional government were committing acts of treason. Please judge for yourself if the group discussed is guilty of such.

If one group is effectively in control of national governments and multinational corporations; promotes world government through control of media, foundation grants, and education; and controls and guides the issues of the day; then they control most options available. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and the financial powers behind it, have done all these things, and promote the "New World Order", as they have for over seventy years.

The CFR is the promotional arm of the Ruling Elite in the United States of America. Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members, and it uses its influence to infiltrate the New World Order into American life. Its' "experts" write scholarly pieces to be used in decision making, the academics expound on the wisdom of a united world, and the media members disseminate the message.

To understand how the most influential people in America came to be members of an organization working purposefully for the overthrow of the Constitution and American sovereignty, we have to go back at least to the early 1900's, though the story begins much earlier (depending on your viewpoint and beliefs).

That a ruling power elite does indeed control the U.S. government behind the scenes has been attested to by many americans in a position to know. Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962), said: "The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes." In a letter to an associate dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote, "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson." February 23, 1954,

Senator William Jenner warned in a speech: "Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded."

Baron M.A. Rothschild wrote, "Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws."

All that is needed to effectively control a government is to have control over the nation's money: a central bank with a monopoly over the supply of money and credit. This had been done in Western Europe, with the creation of privately owned central banks such as the Bank of England.

Georgetown professor Dr. Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton's mentor while at Georgetown) wrote about the goals of the investment bankers who control central banks: "... nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole... controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences."

The Bank of the United States (1816-36), an early attempt at an American central bank, was abolished by President Andrew Jackson, who believed that it threatened the nation. He wrote: "The bold effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had wantonly produced...are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it."

Thomas Jefferson wrote: "The Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution...if the American people allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

Does that not describe the situation in America today?

The U.S. managed to do without a central bank until early in this century, when, according to Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr., "The Money Trust caused the 1907 panic, and thereby forced Congress to create a National Monetary Commission." Headed by Senator Nelson Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., the Commission recommended creation of a central bank.

Though unconstitutional, as only "The Congress shall have Power...To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof..." (Article I, Section 8, U.S. Constitution) the Federal Reserve Act was passed in December 1913; ostensibly to stabilize the economy and prevent further panics, but as Lindberg warned Congress: "This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth...the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized." The Great Depression and numerous recessions later, it is obvious the Federal Reserve produces inflation and federal debt whenever it desires, but not stability.

Congressman Louis McFadden, House Committee on Banking and Currency Chairman (1920-31), stated: "When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and industrialists...acting together to enslave the world...Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is--the Fed has usurped the government."

Although called "Federal," the Federal Reserve system is privately owned by member banks, makes its own policies, and is not subject to oversight by Congress or the President. As the overseer and supplier of reserves, the Fed gave banks access to public funds, which enhanced their lending capacity.

Peter Kershaw, in "Economic Solutions" lists the ten major shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank System as: Rothschild: London and Berlin; Lazard Bros: Paris; Israel Seiff: Italy; Kuhn- Loeb Company: Germany; Warburg: Hamburg and Amsterdam; Lehman Bros: New York; Goldman and Sachs: New York; Rockefeller: New York. (That most, if not all of these families just happen to be Jewish, you may judge the significance of yourself). The balance of stock is owned by major commercial member banks.

According to Davvy [Devvy -Ed.] Kidd, "Why A Bankrupt America?" The Federal Reserve pays the Bureau of Engraving & Printing approximately $23 for each 1,000 notes printed. 10,000 $100 notes (one million dollars) would thus cost the Federal Reserve $230. They then secure a pledge of collateral equal to the face value from the U.S government. The collateral is our land, labor, and assets... collected by their agents, the IRS. By authorizing the Fed to regulate and create money (and thus inflation), Congress gave private banks power to create profits at will.

As Lindberg put it: "The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation...they can unload the stocks on the people at high prices during the excitement and then bring on a panic and buy them back at low prices...the day of reckoning is only a few years removed." That day came in 1929, with the Stock Market crash and Great Depression.

One of the most important powers given to the Fed was the right to buy and sell government securities, and provide loans to member banks so they might also purchase them. This provided another built-in mechanism for profit to the banks, if government debt was increased. All that was needed was a method to pay off the debt. This was accomplished through the passage of the income tax in 1913.

A national income tax was declared unconstitutional in 1895 by the Supreme Court, so a constitutional amendment was proposed in Congress by none other than ...Senator Nelson Aldrich. As presented to the American people it seemed reasonable enough: income tax on only one percent of income under $20,000, with the assurance that it would never increase.

Since it was graduated, the tax would "soak the rich", ...but the rich had other plans, already devising a method of protecting wealth. As described by Gary Allen in his 1976 book "The Rockefeller File," "By the time the (16th) Amendment had been approved by the states, the Rockefeller Foundation was in full operation...about the same time that Judge Kenesaw Landis was ordering the breakup of the Standard Oil monopoly...John D...not only avoided taxes by creating four great tax-exempt foundations; he used them as repositories for his 'divested' interests...made his assets non-taxable so that they might be passed down through generations and gift taxes...Each year the Rockefellers can dump up to half their incomes into their pet foundations and deduct the "donations" from their income tax."

Exchanging ownership for control of wealth, foundations are also a handy means for promoting interests that benefit the wealthy. Millions of foundation dollars have been "donated" to causes such as promoting the use of drugs, while degrading preventive medicine. Since many drugs are made from coal tar derivatives, both oil companies and drug manufacturing concerns (many Rockefeller owned or controlled) are the main beneficiaries.

With the means to loan enormous sums to the government (the Federal Reserve), a method to repay the debt (income tax), and an escape from taxation for the wealthy, (foundations), all that remained was an excuse to borrow money. By some happy "coincidence," in 1914 World War I began, and after American participation national debt rose from $1 billion to $25 billion.

Woodrow Wilson was elected President in 1913, beating incumbent William Howard Taft, who had vowed to veto legislation establishing a central bank. To divide the Republican vote and elect the relatively unknown Wilson, J.P. Morgan and Co. poured money into the candidacy of Teddy Roosevelt and his Progressive Party.

According to an eyewitness, Wilson was brought to Democratic Party headquarters in 1912 by Bernard Baruch, a wealthy banker. He received an "indoctrination course" from those he met, and in return agreed, if elected: to support the projected Federal Reserve and the income tax, and "listen" to advice in case of war in Europe and on the composition of his cabinet.

Wilson's top advisor during his two terms was a man named Colonel Edward M. House. House's biographer, Charles Seymour, called him the "unseen guardian angel" of the Federal Reserve Act, helping to guide it through Congress. Another biographer wrote that House believed: "...the Constitution, product of eighteenth-century minds...was thoroughly outdated; that the country would be better off if the Constitution could be scrapped and rewritten..." House wrote a book entitled "Philip Dru: Administrator," published anonymously in 1912. The hero, Philip Dru, rules America and introduces radical changes, such as a graduated income tax, a central bank, and a "league of nations."

World War I produced both a large national debt, and huge profits for those who had backed Wilson. Baruch was appointed head of the War Industries Board, where he exercised dictatorial power over the national economy. He and the Rockefellers were reported to have earned over $200 million during the war. Wilson backer Cleveland Dodge sold munitions to the allies, while J.P. Morgan loaned them hundreds of millions, with the protection of U.S. entry into the war.

While profit was certainly a motive, the war was also useful to justify the notion of world government. William Hoar reveals in "Architechs of Conspiracy" that during the 1950s, government investigators examining the records of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a long- time promoter of globalism, found that several years before the outbreak of World War I, the Carnegie trustees were planning to involve the U.S. in a general war, to set the stage for world government.

The main obstacle was that Americans did not want any involvement in European wars. Some kind of incident, such as the explosion of the battleship Main, which provoked the Spanish - American war, would have to be provided as provocation. This occurred when the Lusitania, carrying 128 Americans on board, was sunk by a German submarine, and anti-German sentiment was aroused. When war was declared, U.S. propaganda portrayed all Germans as Huns and fanged serpents, and all Americans opposing the war as traitors.

What was not revealed at the time, however, was that the Lusitania was transporting war munitions to England, making it a legitimate target for the Germans. Even so, they had taken out large ads in the New York papers, asking that Americans not take passage on the ship.

The evidence seems to point to a deliberate plan to have the ship sunk by the Germans. Colin Simpson, author of "The Lusitania," wrote that Winston Churchill, head of the British Admiralty during the war, had ordered a report to predict the political impact if a passenger ship carrying Americans was sunk. German naval codes had been broken by the British, who knew approximately where all U-boats near the British Isles were located.

According to Simpson, Commander Joseph Kenworthy, of British Naval Intelligence, stated: "The Lusitania was deliberately sent at considerably reduced speed into an area where a U-boat was known to be waiting...escorts withdrawn." Thus, even though Wilson had been reelected in 1916 with the slogan "He kept us out of war," America soon found itself fighting a European war. Actually, Colonel House had already negotiated a secret agreement with England, committing the U.S. to the conflict. It seems the American public had little say in the matter.

With the end of the war and the Versailles Treaty, which required severe war reparations from Germany, the way was paved for a leader in Germany such as Hitler. Wilson brought to the Paris Peace Conference his famous "fourteen points," with point fourteen being a proposal for a "general association of nations," which was to be the first step towards the goal of One World Government-the League of Nations.

Wilson's official biographer, Ray Stannard Baker, revealed that the League was not Wilson's idea. "...not a single idea--in the Covenant of the League was original with the President." Colonel House was the author of the Covenant, and Wilson had merely rewritten it to conform to his own phraseology.

The League of Nations was established, but it, and the plan for world government eventually failed because the U.S. Senate would not ratify the Versailles Treaty.

Pat Robertson, in "The New World Order," states that Colonel House, along with other internationalists, realized that America would not join any scheme for world government without a change in public opinion.

After a series of meetings, it was decided that an "Institute of International Affairs", with two branches, in the United States and England, would be formed.

The British branch became known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, with leadership provided by members of the Round Table. Begun in the late 1800's by Cecil Rhodes, the Round Table aimed to federate the English speaking peoples of the world, and bring it under their rule.

The Council on Foreign Relations was incorporated as the American branch in New York on July 29, 1921. Founding members included Colonel House, and "...such potentates of international banking as J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Paul Warberg, Otto Kahn, and Jacob Schiff...the same clique which had engineered the establishment of the Federal Reserve System," according to Gary Allen in the October 1972 issue of "AMERICAN OPINION."

The founding president of the CFR was John W. Davis, J.P. Morgan's personal attorney, while the vice-president was Paul Cravath, also representing the Morgan interests. Professor Carroll Quigley characterized the CFR as "...a front group for J.P. Morgan and Company in association with the very small American Round Table Group." Over time Morgan influence was lost to the Rockefellers, who found that one world government fit their philosophy of business well. As John D. Rockefeller, Sr. had said: "Competition is a sin," and global monopoly fit their needs as they grew internationally.

Antony Sutton, a research fellow for the Hoover Institution for War, Revolution, and Peace at Stanford University, wrote of this philosophy: "While monopoly control of industries was once the objective of J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood the most efficient way to gain an unchallenged monopoly was to 'go political' and make society go to work for the monopolists-- under the name of the public good and the public interest."

Frederick C. Howe revealed the strategy of using government in a 1906 book, "Confessions of a Monopolist": "These are the rules of big business...Get a monopoly; let society work for you; and remember that the best of all business is politics..."

As corporations went international, national monopolies could no longer protect their interests. What was needed was a one world system of government controlled from behind the scenes. This had been the plan since the time of Colonel House, and to implement it, it was necessary to weaken the U.S. politically and economically.

During the 1920's, America enjoyed a decade of prosperity, fueled by the easy availability of credit. Between 1923 and 1929 the Federal Reserve expanded the money supply by sixty-two percent. When the stock market crashed, many small investors were ruined, but not "insiders." In March of 1929 Paul Warburg issued a tip the Crash was coming, and the largest investors got out of the market, according to Allen and Abraham in "None Dare Call it Conspiracy."

With their fortunes intact, they were able to buy companies for a fraction of their worth. Shares that had sold for a dollar might now cost a nickel, and the buying power, and wealth, of the rich increased enormously.

Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee declared: "It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence...The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all."

Curtis Dall, son-in-law of FDR and a syndicate manager for Lehman Brothers, an investment firm, was on the N.Y. Stock Exchange floor the day of the crash. In "FDR: My Exploited Father-In-Law," he states: " was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World-Money powers triggered by the planned sudden shortage of call money in the New York Market."

The Crash paved the way for the man Wall Street had groomed for the presidency, FDR. Portrayed as a "man of the little people", the reality was that Roosevelt's family had been involved in New York banking since the eighteenth century.

Frederic Delano, FDR's uncle, served on the original Federal Reserve Board. FDR attended Groton and Harvard, and in the 1920's worked on Wall Street, sitting on the board of directors of eleven different corporations.

Dall wrote of his father-in-law: "...Most of his thoughts, his political 'ammunition,'...were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the CFR-One World Money group. Brilliantly... he exploded that prepared 'ammunition' in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people--and thus paid off and retained his internationalist political support."

Taking America off the gold standard in 1934, FDR opened the way to unrestrained money supply expansion, decades of inflation--and credit revenues for banks. Raising gold prices from $20 an ounce to $35, FDR and Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, Jr. (son of a founding CFR member), gave international bankers huge profits.

FDR's most remembered program, the New Deal, could only be financed through heavy borrowing. In effect, those who had caused the Depression loaned America the money to recover from it. Then, through the National Recovery Administration, proposed by Bernard Baruch in 1930, they were put in charge of regulating the economy. FDR appointed Baruch disciple Hugh Johnson to run the NRA, assisted by CFR member Gerard Swope. With broad powers to regulate wages, prices, and working conditions, it was, as Herbert Hoover wrote in his memoirs: "...pure fascism;...merely a remaking of Mussolini's 'corporate state'..." The Supreme Court eventually ruled the NRA unconstitutional.

During the FDR years, the Council on Foreign Relations captured the political life of the U.S. Besides Treasury Secretary Morgenthau, other CFR members included Secretary of State Edward Stettinus, War Secretary Henry Stimson, and Assistant Secretary of State Sumner Welles.

Since 1934 almost every United States Secretary of State has been a CFR member; and ALL Secretaries of War or Defense, from Henry L. Stimson through Richard Cheney.

The CIA has been under CFR control almost continuously since its creation, starting with Allen Dulles, founding member of the CFR and brother of Secretary of State under President Eisenhower, John Foster Dulles. Allen Dulles had been at the Paris Peace Conference, joined the CFR in 1926, and later became its president.

John Foster Dulles had been one of Woodrow Wilson's young proteges at the Paris Peace Conference. A founding member of the CFR...he was an in-law of the Rockefellers, Chairman of the Board of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Board Chairman of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

In 1940 FDR defeated internationalist Wendell Willkie, who wrote a book entitled "One World," and later became a CFR member. Congressman Usher Burdick protested at the time on the floor of the House that Willkie was being financed by J.P. Morgan and the New York utility bankers. Polls showed few Republicans favored him, yet the media portrayed him as THE Republican candidate.

Since that time nearly ALL presidential candidates have been CFR members. President Truman, who was not a member, was advised by a group of "wise men," all six of whom were CFR members, according to Gary Allen. In 1952 and 1956, CFR Adlai Stevenson challenged CFR Eisenhower.

In 1960, CFR Kennedy (who was probably killed because he had the courage NOT to go along with all their plans) CFR Nixon. In 1964 the GOP stunned the Establishment by nominating its candidate over Nelson Rockefeller.

Rockefeller and the CFR wing proceeded to picture Barry Goldwater as a dangerous radical. In 1968 CFR Nixon ran against CFR Humphrey. The 1972 "contest" featured CFR Nixon vs. CFR McGovern.

CFR candidates for president include George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Edmund Muskie, John Anderson, and Lloyd Bentsen. In 1976 we had Jimmy Carter, who is a member of the Trilateral Commission, created by David Rockefeller and CFR member Zbigniew Brezinski with the goal of economic linkage between Japan, Europe, and the United States, and: "...managing the world economy...a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system." We have also had (though his name strangely disappears from the membership list in 1979) CFR director (1977-79) George Bush, and last but not least, CFR member Bill Clinton.

They have all promoted the "New World Order," controlled by the United Nations. The problem is that "...the present United Nations organization is actually the creation of the CFR and is housed on land in Manhattan donated to it by the family of current CFR chairman David Rockefeller," as Pat Robertson describes it.

The original concept for the UN was the outcome of the Informal Agenda Group, formed in 1943 by Secretary of State Cordell Hull. All except Hull were CFR members, and Isaiah Bowman, a founding member of the CFR, originated the idea.

The American delegation to the San Francisco meeting that drafted the charter of the United Nations in 1949 included CFR members Nelson Rockefeller, John Foster Dulles, John McCloy, and CFR members who were communist agents--Harry Dexter White, Owen Lattimore, and the Secretary-General of the conference, Alger Hiss. In all, the Council sent forty-seven of its members in the United States delegation, effectively controlling the outcome.

Since that time the CFR and its friends in the mass media (largely controlled by CFR members such as Katherine Graham of the "Washington Post" and Henry Luce of" Time, Life"), foundations, and political groups have lobbied consistently to grant the United Nations more authority and power. Bush and the Gulf War were but one of the latest calls for a "New World Order."

Admiral Chester Ward, a member of the CFR for over a decade, became one of its harshest critics, revealing its inner workings in a 1975 book, "Kissinger ON THE COUCH." In it he states "The most powerful cliques in these elitist groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and national independence of the United States."

Most members are one-world-government ideologists whose long- term goals were officially summed up in September 1961 State Department Document 7277, adopted by the Nixon Administration: "...elimination of all armed forces and armaments except those needed to maintain internal order within states and to furnish the United Nations with peace the time it (UN global government) would be so strong no nation could challenge it."

Within the CFR there exists a "much smaller group but more powerful...made up of Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in control of the global government ...This CFR faction is headed by the Rockefeller brothers," according to Ward.

What must be remembered is that this is not some lunatic- fringe group...these are members of one of the most powerful private organizations in the world: the people who determine and control American economic, social, political, and military policy. Members' influence and control extends to "leaders in academia, public service, business, and the media," according to the CFR 1993 "Annual Report."

Their founding they describe as: "American Participants in the Paris Peace Conference decided that it was time for more private Americans to become familiar with the increasing responsibilities and obligations of the United States...there was a need for an organization able to provide for the continuous study of U.S. foreign police for the BENEFIT OF ITS MEMBERS (emphasis mine) and a wider audience of interested Americans."

They sponsor hundreds of programs, where members "exchange views with American and foreign officials and policy experts... discuss foreign policy issues...consider international issues of concern to the business community" (Corporate business), and "...affiliated groups of community leaders throughout the United with decision makers."

The CFR states that it is "host to many views, advocate of none," and it "has no affiliation with the U.S. government." No, no affiliation at all, if you don't count: "A Council member was elected president of the United States...Dozens of other Council colleagues were called to serve in cabinet and sub-cabinet positions," as they describe it in "Foreign Afairs," along with many members of Congress, the Supreme Court, the Joint Chiefs, the Federal Reserve, and many other Federal bureaucrats.

They are not AFFILIATED with government, they ARE the government, in effect.

One re-occurring view was stated in the 50th anniversary issue of "Foreign Affairs," the official publication of the CFR. In an article by Kingman Brewster, Jr. entitled "Reflections on Our National Purpose." Our purpose should be, according to him, to do away with our nationality, to "take some risks in order to invite others to pool their sovereignty with ours..."

These "risks" include disarming to the point where we would be helpless against the "peace-keeping" forces of a global UN government. We should happily surrender our sovereignty to the world government in the interests of the "world community."

Today we have the spectacle of Spc. 4 Michael New, a U.S. soldier in Germany who refuses to wear the uniform of the UN, facing an "administrative discharge." He states rightly that he swore an oath to defend the U.S. Constitution, not the United Nations. Many other Americans have taken that same oath, such as myself, and believe it is our sworn duty still to defend the Constitution, since an oath sworn before God must be fulfilled. (Why else do we swear to tell the truth in our courts, or when taking public office?) Is it a crime these days to actually BELIEVE in God and the oath that was taken?

Meanwhile, others who attempt to destroy the Constitution and our sovereignty are given honors and position...At least they are not hypocrites...only supremely arrogant.

"In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned assault..." in the opinion of Richard N. Gardner, former deputy assistant Secretary of State in "Foreign Affairs," April 1974.

James Warburg, son of CFR founder Paul Warburg, and a member of FDR's "brain trust," testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, "We shall have world government whether or not you like it--by conquest or consent."

Is this an AMERICAN speaking, or a dangerous lunatic? Who is this "We" who threatens to CONQUER us?

They are a group that actually has the power to do it, and is doing it every day, bit by bit.

CFR Members in the mass media, education, and entertainment push their propaganda of "humanism" and world brotherhood. We should all live in peace under a world government, and forget about such selfish things as nationalities and patriotism. We can solve our own problems. We don't need God [God does not exist -Ed.], or morals, or values: it's all relative, anyway, right?...Because if we actually had some moral character and values, we might be able to discern that these people are actually EVIL.

The Bible says that the LOVE of money is the root of all evil (1 Tim. 6:10). These people are evil because they love money and power, and greed drives them to do anything to achieve their goals. They have lost all morality and conscience, and believe such concepts, as well as our Constitution, "outdated".

THAT is insanity--to have more wealth than can be spent, and still it is never enough. They have to control governments, start wars, conspire to rule the world; least [lest -Ed.] the "common people" wake up to how they have gained their wealth, take it away from them, and demand that they pay the price for their crimes.

That is why they constantly pit us one against the other, with "Diversity," Affirmative Action, and other programs, against white, men against women, rural against urban, ranchers against environmentalists, and on and on...least [lest -Ed.] we look in their direction.

We The People are held to a much higher standard. If we threaten the President or a public official, we are charged with a crime...yet the One-World-Gang can threaten the Constitution and the liberties of We The People, the sovereign rulers of this nation, and nothing is said or done.

Perhaps they do not fear what Man can do to them... they believe they have arranged everything, and their power and wealth will prevail in this world. However, those among them who have sworn an oath before God to uphold and defend the Constitution: the President, members of Congress, and the military; may find one day that they do indeed have something to fear.

Colonel House, the fallen angel, still has relatives controlling the CFR. Karen Elliot House is Chairman of the Membership Committee, and a member of the Nominating Committee, along with Jeane Kirkpatrick. David Rockefeller is now "Honorary Chairman of the Board", after serving as Chairman 1970-1985; and "Director Emeritus," after serving as a Director 1949-1985. Peter G. Peterson is Chairman, Admiral B. R. Inman is Vice Chairman, while Thomas Foley and Jeane Kirkpatrick are Directors serving on the Executive Committee.

These "private citizens" have access to government officials and policy makers as often as they wish, yet the results of their meetings can only be given to other government officials, corporate officers, or law partners. Participants are forbidden to transmit an attributed statement to any public medium, such as newspapers or TV, where there is "risk that it will promptly be widely circulated or published," as the "Annual Report" puts it.

Should not OUR public officials be forbidden to meet in secret with private groups? Public officials should only be allowed to discuss public business and policy in a public forum. The Public...remember US?

There is much more to say about this group and their plans for America. Gary Allen, in "The Rockefeller File," states that they are behind the many regional government plans, which would abolish city, county, and state lines, leaving us at the mercy of federal bureaucrats; and behind the push for "land use" controls. They want "federal control of everything. Since they intend to control the federal government..."

There are also the many allegations of involvement in gun running, drug smuggling, prostitution and sex slaves; and the many mysterious assassinations and "suicides" of witnesses and others who get too close to the truth...but that is another story.


* Bo Adelmann, 1986. "The Federal Reserve System." The New American, October 17.
* Gary Allen, 1976. "The Rockefeller File". Seal Beach, CA: '76 Press.
* Gary Allen with Larry Abraham, 1972. "None Dare Call it Conspiracy."
* Rossmoor, CA: Concord Press.
* "Congressional Record," December 22, 1913, Vol. 51.
* Phoebe and Kent Courtney, 1962. "America's Unelected Rulers, The Council on Foreign Relations." New Orleans: Conservative Society of America.
* Curtis B. Dall, 1970. "FDR My Exploited Father-In-Law." Washington D.C.: Action Associates.
* A. Ralph Epperson, 1985. "The Unseen Hand." Tucson, AZ: Publius Press.
* "F.D.R.: His Personal Letters," 1950. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
* William P. Hoar, 1984. "Architects of Conspiracy." Belmont MA: Western Islands.
* Herbert Hoover, 1952. "The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover, The Great Depression 1929-1941." New York: Macmillan.
* Frederick C. Howe, 1906. "Confessions of a Monopolist." Chicago: Public Publishing Co.
* Robert C. Johansen, 1980. "Models of World Order," in "Dilemmas of War and Peace."
* Peter Kershaw, 1994. "Economic Solutions."
* Devvy Kidd, 1995. "Why A Bankrupt America?" Colorado: Project Liberty.
* Ferdinand Lundberg, 1938. "America's 60 Families." New York: Vanguard.
* Louis T. McFadden, 1934. "The Federal Reserve Corporation, remarks in Congress."
* Boston: Forum Publication Co. James Perloff, 1988. "The Shadows of Power." Appleton, WI: Western Islands.
* Carroll Quigley, 1966. "Tragedy and Hope." New York: Macmillan.
* Pat Robertson, 1991. "The New World Order." Dallas: Word Publishing.
* Charles Seymour, ed., 1926. "The Intimate Paper of Colonel House." Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
* Colin Simpson, 1972. "The Lusitania." Boston: Little, Brown.
* Arthur D. Howde Smith, 1940. "Mr House ob5 Texas." New York: Funk and Wagnalls.
* Antony C. Sutton, 1975. "Wall Street and FDR." New Rochelle, New York: Arlington House.
* George Sylvester Viereck, 1932. "The Strangest Friendship in History." New York: Liveright.

This document may be freely distributed or quoted in any medium, provided credit is given to the author and The Courier.

Copyright 1995

William Blase

The Courier
115 W. Hall Hatch, New Mexico 87937
TEL 505 267 3546
FAX 505 267 3019

Bush Clinton Occult Satanism

Bush and Clinton: Satanic/Occult Symbolism 2

Friday, February 15, 2008

North American Union = Orwellian Brave New World

North American Union = Orwellian Brave New World

On Ronald Reagan

Ronald Reagan was a good guy. people liked ronald reagan. Reagan HATED the government. Ron Paul used to campaign for Ronald Reagan and has many of the same beliefs.

the only problem was that the Illuminati/New World Order hijacked Reagan by forcing him at the republican national convention in 1980 to have ex-CIA chief Bilderberger Council on Foreign Relations member George H.W. Bush as the Vice President. reagan had enough delegates to do what he wanted, but the CIA/CFR-controlled heads of the GOP forced reagan to have their guy (Bush) in the white house. they told reagan and his campaigners, that they would pull the funding and not allow Reagan to have any money from the GOP to run against the democrat, UNLESS they took Bush as VP.

It is widely recognized that Bush really ran the white house from 1980-1992. Ronald reagan could not stand Bush, and some people even claim that the Bush's drugged and mind-controlled reagan and were just used him as a public figure/puppet who the public liked. (coincidence he had alzhimer's?)

Monday, February 11, 2008

Illuminait - the Board Game

Illuminati - the Board Game

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Corporate Globalization Accelerates...

Undemocratic Corporate Globalization Accelerates Via a Proposed "Super NAFTA" by 2010

It is no secret that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), set up by Globalist Kingpin David Rockefeller, exists to push for a world government. Carroll Quigley, mentor to Bill Clinton, member of CFR, says himself, "The Council on Foreign Relations...believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established." In an effort to make this a reality, they have used incrementalism as a way to gain gradual acceptance for their plans.

The first step, with the European Union, and now North America, was trade blocs, then misnamed protectionist "free trade" zones, then the physical merging of key infrastructure - military, legislative, and other bodies. This whole process is done with a blind eye from Congress and the mainstream media - with the exception of CNN's Lou Dobbs. It is also being done with the full approval of all the Presidential Candidates of both major political parties with the exception of Ron Paul.

CFR President Richard Haass believes "states would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves" and that "Globalization thus implies that sovereignty...needs to become weaker." Admiral Chester Ward, former CFR member and Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy has stated, "The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations in promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government. Once the ruling members of the CFR...have decided that the U.S. Government should adopt a particular policy...the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to confound and discredit, intellectually and political, any opposition."

Corporations have influence or control over all the Presidential candidates, Congress, and the mainstream media. It is the corporate goal to accelerate the flow of both cargo and people across this country's Northern and Southern borders. They want an international NAFTA superhighway even if it means using eminent domain to steal people's ranches and farmland. Another dream is to have a workforce consisting completely of illegal immigrants who they can underpay off the books and save money on wages, taxes, and benefits. Their goals are sadly being accomplished as the Bush administration fails to enforce this country's border laws, even in the wake of 9-11 and terrorist threats.

We’ve had a record three million illegal immigrants migrate into this country in the last year, yet all you hear the Bush administration talk about it our “security.” So instead, they've decided to take away our Constitutional rights. The Bush administration has signed agreements at the Security and Prosperity and Partnership meetings that are physically creating a North American Union under our eyes, all without public discourse or open debate.
Despite their name, the North American Free Trade Agreement and the NAU - just like the EU - are not free market institutions. They are protectionist communities who compete with other trade blocs like the European Union and soon-to-be Asian-Pacific Union. While tooted as free market to get the approval of conservatives, the NAU is anything but a free market. In laisez-faire economics, no institutions exist to hinder the free flow of goods from one place to another. The NAU, like the EU, would have an external tariff, making imported goods more expensive and hurting the free choice of the consumer, in order for governments and corporations to generate enormous profits.

"The secret organizations of the world power elite are no longer secret. They have planned and are now leading us into a one-world Communist government. The combining of national government started with the European Union....and now a European Parliament that is feverishly passing laws that override the laws of the member nations...a [European] constitution was drafted but rejected by many member nations. Never mind, they implemented it anyway. Now its North America's turn....the President has attended secret meetings and signed at least two agreements. Money from our treasury is being spent [to create] a new currency, the Amero, and a new Constitution, modeled after the Soviet Union’s Constitution…Our rights will not be inalienable but they will be granted by government, who can also take them away. You will have a [North American] ID Card with a Radio Frequency Identification Chip in it.” -Stan Jones, U.S. Senate Candidate, Libertarian Montana

It is important to note that every Presidential candidate (besides Ron Paul) is a CFR member. The Obamas, John Edwards, and the Clintons included. A Democratic Party administration will not save us from the oncoming but not inevitable North American Union. It is not inevitable if we join the informed uprising – the “Ron Paul Revolution” of people who will not simply demand but physically become the leaders who will adhere to the Constitution and who will swear an oath to protect National Sovereignty, and of course never join the CFR and reject its undemocratic goals.

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
- David Rockefeller, Memoirs , 2002, page 405

"We are on the verge of a Global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." - David Rockefeller

"The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, the Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberg Group have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years." - Dr. Johannes Koeppl - former official of the German Ministry for Defense and adviser to NATO.

Important websites:

"The surge" is working: 53 killed in Iraq today

The troop surge in Iraq is working!
If by working you mean, killing people!

Ron Paul for President in 2008 - THE ONLY ANTI-WAR CANDIDATE.

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Willie Nelson Says 9-11 An Inside Job

Willie Nelson Says 9-11 Was An Inside Job in Alex Jones Interview

The Official 9/11 Story Is Falling Apart

Willie Nelson Says 9-11 Was An Inside Job

Willie Nelson Says 9-11 Was An Inside Job in Alex Jones Interview

The Official 9/11 Story Is Falling Apart

Infowars Podcast

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

A Ron Paul Congress

Valentines Day Feb 14th, there is a "money bomb" to the congressional candidates who follow Ron Paul's platform.

Monday, February 04, 2008

Zeitgeist on the Federal Reserve

"The refusal of King George III to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators was probably the prime cause of the [American] revolution." -Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father

Youtube - Zeitgest on the Federal Reserve part 1 link Google video link
Youtube - Zeitgest on the Federal Reserve part 2 link
Youtube - Zeitgest on the Federal Reserve part 3 link
Youtube - Zeitgest on the Federal Reserve part 4 link
Youtube - Zeitgest on the Federal Reserve part 5 link

HillaryCare at Gunpoint

HillaryCare at Gunpoint

As decider-commander, Hillary will come gunning for you — or your paycheck at least — that is if you don’t pay your neighbor’s health care tab.

“Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans,” reports the Associated Press.

The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require universal coverage. Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC’s “This Week,” she said: “I think there are a number of mechanisms” that are possible, including “going after people’s wages, automatic enrollment.”

Universal coverage, sort of like universal servitude. Is it possible one of the “mechanisms” Clinton has in mind might be a SWAT team to ensure “automatic enrollment,” that is to say mandatory participation at the behest of the state?

“Clinton said such measures would apply only to workers who can afford health coverage but refuse to buy it.” In short, the government will decide not only what you can afford, but what kind of health care you will get, like it or not.

Call it mandatory insurance the same way car insurance is mandatory. It’s a scheme designed to enrich corporations, of course, as Clinton and Obama and the rest of them are all about big corporations.

Even the Greens, usually not shy about socialist schemes, are wary of this one. “Green Party leaders strongly criticized Sen. Hillary Clinton’s health care reform plan, calling it a capitulation to private HMO and insurance corporations and an affront to Americans who lack adequate access to health care,” a Green Party press release announced last September. “Greens called Sen. Clinton’s and other Democratic plans expensive and inefficient because of the duplication of administrative costs of multiple plans and because they offer fewer services in deference to profits.”

“A mandated health insurance requirement plan would guarantee more profits for health insurance companies and give them even more control over every American’s health care. It would not in any way contribute to health care reform. If put into effect, middle class families would be put into the position of making a choice whether to pay their mortgage or rent or to pay their health insurance coverage,” writes Shari Schneider. “It is worth noting that in 2005, more than half of all the bankruptcies filed were due to medical bills. One million Americans file bankruptcy each year citing medical bills and three-quarters of them already have medical insurance coverage. Many of them are working, have college degrees and own their own homes. If forced to purchase the required health insurance coverage under Clinton’s plan, even more Americans might have to file bankruptcy. Or, they could be faced with being labeled a tax evader because they are in violation of the mandated requirement.”

More reason to send out the aforementioned boys dressed in ninja black toting AR-15s and night vision monoculars.

In addition to profits gleaned at gunpoint, the Clinton scheme would require mandatory check-ups, including mental screenings, a truly scary prospect now that Clinton’s colleagues plan to pass the so-called Homegrown Terrorism bill in the Senate. Imagine a state shrink categorizing you as an “extremist” because you talked a bit too much about the Constitution during your screening.

“Both Edwards and Clinton have said that under their presidency every citizen in the U.S. would have to enroll in a state-managed socialized health care system where regular check ups, including mental screenings, would be mandatory,” warns Steve Watson. “The vision of an America where every citizen is forced by law to participate in health screenings overseen by the government should set stark warning bells ringing.”

Indeed, the warning bells are a-ringing, sort of like a five alarm fire. But few are paying attention.

Sunday, February 03, 2008

Wesley Snipes Is Acquitted of Tax Felonies

The Snipes case is the fourth significant loss by Justice Department prosecutors who brought felony charges against people who were leading figures in the tax denier movement.

Wesley Snipes Is Acquitted of Tax Felonies

Like it or not, the Wesley Snipes tax case is going to introduce a wider segment of the American public to the possibility that the Federal Income Tax is not entirely legal, that the 16th Amendment was never properly ratified, and that "income" means gain from corporate activity, NOT wages and salaries which are exchanged for labor of equal worth.

The problem is that the majority of Americans are well aware that the US Government lied about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. And as they struggle to pay their bills, they will probably be taking a good hard look at that 1040 form and wondering just how a supposedly free society came to have a government so greedy.

So inevitably, the same media that helped sell that lie about Saddam's "nookular" bombs is trying to reassure us serfs that taxes are legal, that we can trust the US Government when it says that the 16th Amendment was ratified (even though nobody is able to document that fact), and that we should go on making do with less so that the government can have more.

All we ask is that you study the matter carefully and think for yourself. Do not let the TV talking heads tell you what truth is, for they do not know themselves. Certainly do not listen to judges who claim that taxes are legal, for after all, they are paid from tax revenues, and more to the point, the Constitution does not allow a judge to declare something legal from the bench when it is not so, nor does the Constitution compel us to accept such a judicial declaration when we know it to be untrue.

For A Documentary With Many Arguments Against Your "Mandate" To Pay Taxes: Freedom To Fascism

Morgan Stanely GSO Advises the Rich to Stock Up on Canned Food, Medicine, & Guns

Former Chairman of Morgan Stanley Asset Management & Chief Global Strategist at Morgan Stanley says "Listen to markets, learn from history and prepare for the worst."

Jan. 30 (Bloomberg) -- Barton Biggs has some offbeat advice for the rich: Insure yourself against war and disaster by buying a remote farm or ranch and stocking it with ``seed, fertilizer, canned food, wine, medicine, clothes, etc.''

The ``etc.'' must mean guns.

``A few rounds over the approaching brigands' heads would probably be a compelling persuader that there are easier farms to pillage,'' he writes in his new book, ``Wealth, War and Wisdom.''

Clouds May Harbor Nanobacteria

Clouds May Harbor Nanobacteria

Tiny particles linked to a number of painful and sometimes deadly diseases may spread across the globe by hitching a ride in clouds, claim researchers in a recent issue of the Journal of Proteome Research.

The particles, known as nanobacteria, are 100 times smaller than typical bacteria and have been found in kidney stones, arterial plaques and ovarian cancers.

But scientists have yet to agree whether the particles actually cause the diseases or how they infect humans.

Also unknown is whether the particles are life forms or an unknown type of crystal -- a rift that has sparked one of the biggest controversies in modern microbiology.

Now, a new theory by Andrei Sommer, of the University of Ulm, Germany, and N. Chandra Wickramasinghe, of Cardiff University in the United Kingdom, attempts to show how nanobacteria moves from humans to the environment and back.

In a letter in the February issue of the Journal of Proteome Research, the pair describe studies suggesting that nanobacteria exist in the atmosphere -- at least above Hyderabad, India, where the researchers captured samples of the air with a specially designed balloon.

The nanobacteria particles closely resembled those found in humans when compared on seven key criteria, including size and shape -- a finding that suggests humans can be infected through the atmosphere.

In the journal's introduction to the paper, Sommer theorizes that the particles may be introduced to the atmosphere through human urine, which enters waste-water streams and becomes aerosolized.

Once in the atmosphere, the nanobacteria can fall back to Earth in dry or wet form. The researchers think dry forms are relatively harmless, but wet forms, in raindrops, would be more likely to be infectious because the nanobacteria would still be "active."

"Inactive, transiently desiccated microorganisms, transported back from the dry atmosphere to the Earth by gravity, are likely to cause little harm, compared to those returning in rain drops, after having been incorporated for some time in long-lived clouds, where they would encounter better conditions for revitalization," wrote the researchers.

The researchers also suggested that nanobacteria could help clouds develop by clumping together at the perfect size to promote the collection of airborne water droplets.

Attempts to contact Sommer and Wickramasinghe after business hours Friday were unsuccessful.

Friday, February 01, 2008

Japanese doing their own 9/11 investigation

On January 9th 2008 in Japanese Parliament, The Councillor for the DPJ, Democratic Party of Japan, Yukihisa Fujita gave a 40 minute presentation to THEE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN, Yasao Fukuda! In this presentation he told the PM that neither the Parliament nor the Japanese people believe the official story of 9/11! He held up large photos of the Pentagon and WTC and also cited insider trading evidence that is conclusive of an inside job. They are considering whether or not they can ARREST GEORGE BUSH since 24 Japanese citizens died on 9/11. This was all broadcast on Japans National Television station NHK (japan equivalent of ABC). They are questioning whether or not they should continue to support the war on Terror since 9/11 is the basis for it.

The walls are beginning to crack! This is no longer a conspiracy theory when you have the 2nd richest, and arguably most intelligent and educated country in the world presenting the evidence to their PRIME MINISTER on national TV!



BS: Ronald Reagan Wins Louisiana Caucus


January 23, 2008
Ronald Reagan Wins Louisiana Caucus
Posted by Nick Bradley at January 23, 2008 08:56 AM

According to the Shreveport Times, the Pro-Life/Pro-Family ticket won in all 7 districts last night. All non-Paul candidates pooled their delegates into a single delegate slate: Huck, Romney, Benito, McCain, Thompson.

And what about Reagan? Well, this is the handout for the Pro-Life/Pro-Family delegate slate; It has a photo of Ron and Nancy Reagan and says "win one for the gipper." This is a new low for the rest of the field, but it is what it is and I am not suprised one bit.

Non-Paul candidates also pooled their resources in Wyoming, where Paul was actually ahead on some of the first ballots, but supporters of the various neocon candidates pooled their support to win the county.

On the plus side:

1. The coalition delegate slate will be split 4 ways at the state convention, and Paul may have more than any one candidate.

2. Paul supposedly has most of the alternate delegate slots, most of which were uncontested. So if somebody doesn't show up or is ruled ineligible, a Paul delegate can step up.

Update: The LA GOP is reporting that there are only 650 provisional ballots (not half like I heard earlier), and that the provisional ballots will not be counted in the 3rd and 7th districts due to a sufficient margin of victory. However, they will be counted in the other districts because it can affect the margin of error. With 10,000 votes cast and 650 provisional ballots, the margin of victory in the other districts must have been very close. In addition, alternates were selected in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th districts.

Remote Neural Monitoring

John St. Clair Akwei vs. NSA, Ft. Meade, MD