Matt Rammelkamp's Blog
Personal blog of Matthew Rammelkamp from 2005 - 2009. Blog is now changing sites to www.MatthewThomas.tv
Friday, November 30, 2007
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Ron Paul Odds Slashed to 5/2
Ron Paul: Odds slashed drastically
Ron Paul's odds to be named as the Republican candidate for the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election have also been slashed down to 5/2 at Bodog, making him the second in the race by odds, following Rudy Giuliani with odds 20/21.
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Rudy's Terror Ties, How He's NOT the Hero of 9-11
Rudy's Ties To Islamic Terrorism:
The Real Rudy: Active Fire Chief Speaks Out on His Failures on 9-11:
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Why Socialized Medicine Is Not the Answer, Why Michael Moore is wrong about healthcare (by an ND/MD)
makes total sense!
Take that michael!
"On health care McKinney states, "I've supported every universal single payer health care plan. She goes on to state, “People who rail against `socialized medicine' in Canada and the UK have to explain why life expectancy is longer in Canada and the UK, why infant mortality is lower in Canada and the UK" (Deeth). McKinney further denounces the war in Iraq stating that the money being squandered could be better used on social programs such as rebuilding New Orleans, child nutrition, and health care, stating in part, “one billion dollars a day can provide medical care for the 47 million Americans who don’t have health insurance” (McKinney)."
I would expect that life expectancy is greater in the U.K. and Canada for many reasons, one critical but always neglected part is that our federal government subsidizes cheap food and agribusiness, thus supporting the corn-industrial complex which sells junk-food as food and now, as whole foods and healthy foods, along with a tremendous amount of junk food that is sold as junk food.
The source you cite, McKinney, says that it will only cost 1 billion dollars a day to take care of the 47 million uninsured in medical treatment in this country. That's 365 billion a year. That's a cost of 7765 per covered person per year. However, under socialized medicine everyone is covered. If we use the figure quoted by McKinney times the population of the USA (300 million) we find that it will cost 2 329 500 000 000, or approximately the current federal budget. That doesn't include the increase in demand created by "free" healthcare which could easily double or triple or otherwise multiply that number. That number is about 20 percent of the GDP. According to a pro-universal health care outfit, that's the amount that would otherwise be reached by 2015. http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml . That's a significant difference that would be multiplied. An extra five, ten, or twenty percent out of peoples pockets will create mass impoverishment and widespread suffering.
The numbers don't work, based solely supply and demand. We are a nation of consumers now, not producers, so we have a lot less to loot to support this mad scheme. The current problems were created by the government, so you propose to dramatically multiply the role and scope of government in health care. I can not afford to pay for my own health care, so you propose I pay for everyone elses health care, and my health care will be paid by everyone else. The key part you omit from your understanding of this plan is that that everyone else can't afford their health care - so they won't be able to afford mine.
Government has again usurped the role of the monarchy - it's powers are those held in times past by those allegedly descended from gods. It is not possible to wave the magic wand of legislation and use the powers of government to take what it wants from people and force them to obey to achieve acts of good. To actually fix our medical system would require a miracle, a genuine miracle, i.e. divine intervention to set things right no matter how impossible the reality. A massive Jesus with the loaves of bread routine would be necessary to efficiently create a huge increase in supply of a wide variety of expensive pieces of infrastructure and equipment and skilled labor needed to treat everyone in the country for all of their medical problems. That's not possible in reality. It would also take another miracle to keep the corruption and incompetence and waste down to the point where the cost would be comparable to other countries. That too is not possible if the program is inherently corrupt by being completely contrary to the American principles of law and liberty.
The government doesn't have the ability to work miracles. It can't change reality. It is very easy to propose solutions. There is a great saying, "The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference". The magic wand of government has been aimed at poverty, drugs, terrorism, food, education, and many other areas of our lives, and in each case, it has made new problems without solving the old problems.
The unfortunate reality is that life sucks in many ways. There isn't enough of everything for everyone. People get sick. People die. People get sick and die when they could have been saved. I agree we should try something new, but more of the same isn't the solution. I believe in time you will see your dream granted, and then you will see that it is a nightmare you have created. Our society is already falling apart, you wish to accelerate it. I shudder at the thought of the consequences to what we call medicine in this country under any such plan of federal government controlled health care. It will guarantee America becoming a Third World nation.
Friday, November 16, 2007
For Mass Murderers, Gun Control Works
Quotes to use throughout article:“A license shall not be granted if the applicant…is a Jew.”
Mao Zedong himself says “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
For Mass Murderers, Gun Control Works: Calculated Genocide of 170 Million
Five Case Examples: The Armenian Genocide, Soviet Union, China, Nazi Germany, and Guatemala
Imagine if two-thirds of all Americans were wiped off the planet – or the equivalent populations of Germany, Spain, and France were just gone. That’s how many people have been killed by governments in the 20th Century. Those 170 Million people all were killed in calculated genocide; with no means to defend themselves (using the most sums of the conservative numbers in each case). In each case, self defense was against the law and the populations that were exterminated were targeted with first gun registration, followed by gun control legislation, then gun confiscation. In some cases, the governments passed the legislation with the intent to attack the soon-to-be unarmed populace. In other cases, like in the Nanking Massacre, an invading force took advantage of an unarmed populace. Let’s study – in brief detail – how gun control has always been an ingredient in any necessary genocide or mass murder of humans. Those who do not learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
Armenian Genocide: 1.5 million Killed By Gun Control
In Turkey from 1915-1917, during the reign of the Young Turks of the Ottoman Empire developed a systematic plan to eliminate the Armenians, the largest minority in Turkey. The Armenian Holocaust is the second most studied example of Genocide in history. Public documents show the government planned on mass genocide, but kept their intentions secret at the time. One document uncovered says, “They must all be killed, men, women, and children without discrimination.” The rulers lied about their intentions, drafted the Armenians into the Army (it was World War I), separated the Armenians into brigades, and sent them to forced labor camps. In the camps, they were worked to death, starved, or murdered in groups away from public view.
In order to kill of the rest of the Armenians, it was necessary to round them up without confrontation or fighting. First, it became illegal to possess weapons without registering with the government, under punishment of imprisonment. Then it became illegal for Armenians to own guns, and they were ordered to turn them in. Police went from home to home ransacking and torturing people for their guns. Then, all Armenians were reported to go to camps. Guards forced march the Armenians to death over rough terrain in hot summer months. Those who didn’t die of exhaustion were killed by guards. Fewer than one in ten survived the march. The survivors were all butchered in the end. Overall, 1.5 million of the 2 million Armenians in all of Turkey were massacred.
Communist USSR: 60 Million Killed by Gun Control
In 1917 when the Communists came to power in the Soviet Union, they immediately passed laws making it impossible for non-party members to own firearms, “any violation of laws concerning…firearms is punishable by forced labor.” Ukraine was the breadbasket of the state, and although it craved independence, Stalin needed the grain to export and sell for industrial expansion. In 1929, Stalin decreed that all farmland, livestock, and produce are property of the state, and that everyone needed to move to government owned farms. Seven million kulaks, the best farmers, were separated and sent to forced labor camps.
For the rest, extraordinary quotas were set, enforced by soldiers with guns. Farmers started to rebel – but because of ten years of gun confiscation laws, the helpless people can fight back only with farm tools or sabotage. Since Stalin controls all food distribution, he can cut off the food and starve entire regions. He controls all travel with internal passports, and secret police can force starving dominions to remain in isolated lands without food. Powerless people cannot get plentiful food stored in grain elevators nearby protected with armed guards. Spies watched for anyone taking grain from fields; anyone caught hiding food was executed. Desperate families resorted to cannibalism. All this while Stalin increased grain exports and the West had no clue that 10 million were being killed by starvation from 1929-1934 alone. Over the entire course of Stalin’s communist rein wound up killing a total of 60 million, conservatively.
China: Nationalists or Communists Kill Perhaps 100 Million, Using Gun Bans:
In China, 1935, the Nationalist government came to power and decreed “Whoever, without authority…is found in possession of guns, shall be punished with imprisonment.” From 1942-1944, four million die in famines aggravated by government confiscation of crops.
In 1937-1944, during the Chino-Japanese War, men who refused to be drafted into the army were tortured, mutilated, and killed. Those uncooperative in the army were shot or starved to death. Four million were killed.
In 1937, during the Rape of Nanking – 225,000 Japanese soldiers advanced on the city. Chinese soldiers fled as hundreds of thousands of women, children, sick, and old people were left to the mercy of the foreign invaders. Forbidden to own firearms and lacking self defense, the people were helpless. They are raped, buried alive, burned alive, used for bayonet practice, and forced to watch as their own organs were ripped out of their bodies while still alive. The massacre takes the lives of 200,000 unarmed Chinese.
In 1949, the communists take over, and continue with their own gun bans. The people are considered tools of the government. For 38 years, the communist violence and economic experiments take the lives of between 35 and 100 million. Mao Zedong himself says “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” He knew; he controlled all the guns.
Hitler Kills 21 Million; Includes Race Specific Gun Control Bans
In January of 1933, Hitler was elected democratically. Because of a gun registration law passed just five years earlier, his government already knows which Germans own guns. “Licenses to obtain or carry firearms shall be issued only to persons whose reliability is not in doubt, and only after providing a need for them.” Mass seizures of weapons from political opponents occur through modern record keeping. Obedient gun turn-ins and violent raids reduce ordinary Germans to helplessness. Within months, the Nazis finally consolidate their power and pass their own laws – “A license shall not be granted if the applicant…is a Jew.”
In November 1938, Germans attack the Jews: looting storefronts, burning synagogues, committing murder. The next day a law stating “Jews forbidden to possess weapons” is passed, this includes a firearm, club, or sharp-edged weapon. Violators face five years in a concentration camp. Jews turn in their weapons to the police, or the Nazis storm in after them. The Jews are stripped of their power to resist. Census data and National ID Cards help tell the Nazis exactly who is a Jew. In a few days of terror, between 30,000 and 90,000 Jewish men, mostly community leaders, are arrested and sent to concentration camps – the beginning of the final solution.
All across Europe, men and women fought and resisted the Nazis, but not in Germany where Hitler seized their weapons. Between 1933 and 1945, three million political opponents were captured and sent to concentration camps, six million Jews (one million children), Gypsies, Slavs, the Disabled, Critics, and Pacifists are exterminated. Throughout Europe, 21 million people perish due to Hitler’s reign from non-combatant causes; more than half are killed inside of Germany by defenseless civilians.
Guatemala’s Gun Control Bans Helped Paramilitary Killing or Disappearing of 200,000
In Guatemala, 200,000 people were killed and disappeared in the 1980’s, as a right-wing paramilitary government attacked the left and left-sympathizers. In 1940, a gun control law was passed saying only government officials may carry firearms. In 1964, another was passed saying “All sales of firearms must be reported to the Ministry of Defense.”
All of these regimes have promised to act for the common good, but delivered tyranny instead. Many were elected democratically. None of these Genocides are made possible without gun control and confiscation. Gun registration and gun bans are always a necessary ingredient for genocide of a race or population. These are just four examples, but four of the largest examples of genocide in the 20th Century. As we enter a new century, we must study the past and learn to keep the power with ourselves and not within governments and power positions that attract corrupt mass murderers who have no respect for us human beings and our right to life and freedom.
Gun Control: A History of American Slaughter, Murder, and Imprisonment
Case Examples: Native Americans, Blacks, Japanese during WWII
Throughout the history of the United States, gun registration, restriction, or gun ban laws have been used to make the oppressed powerless. The history of gun control in the U.S. has nothing to do with protecting us from accidents or criminals, and everything to do with controlling political power.
From the beginning of white colonial settlements in North America, relationships between whites and Native Americans have been uneasy. The situation escalated when white settlers pushed further into Native lands. Throughout the settlement of North America, Native Americans have been massacred, starved, and tortured because their weapons were not equal to the whites.
In the first half of the 19th Century, millions of blacks were used as slaves in United States, mostly the south. In 1850, there were 4 million blacks as slaves. There were also 250,000 free blacks living amongst them. Many of them were working to outlaw slavery. As rebellion grew, the white majority feared uprisings – maintaining control of blacks and slaves was vital to their survival. Each state passed strict gun control laws banning blacks from having the power to protect themselves, or rise up and rebel.
America’s early disarmament laws are designed to keep one race, and once race only helpless and powerless. “No slave may use firearms even in self defense. He may hunt with firearms only…with his master’s written permission” –Louisiana Law 1806
“Free Negros may not carry firearms.” –Florida law 1831, Mississippi Law 1852, Alabama Law 1866, Louisiana Law – post civil war. “White citizen patrols “Shall enter into all Negro houses…and lawfully seize…arms, weapons…” –Florida Law 1825.
In 1865, the North won the Civil War, effectively ending slavery. Three years later, the 14th amendment was ratified; extending full citizenship and equal legal protection to blacks; at least on paper. Southern states passed different laws that are in compliance with the 14th Amendment of equal protection, in order to keep guns out of the hands of the poor blacks. “Only [high cost] army and navy model handguns may be sold.” –Tennessee Law 1870, Arkansas law 1882. “Dealers must record the race of all buyers of pistols and ammunition” -Mississippi Law 1906. “The Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed not to control guns but to control blacks.” -Robert Sherrill, journalist, gun control supporter.
Disarmament for blacks in this manner, despite the 14th amendment, did not bring peace or safety for blacks in the south. From 1880-1965, mobs lynched more than 3500 black people, sometimes for real crimes, sometimes for simply insults against whites, sometimes mobs snatched blacks from the streets or jails. They were abused, tortured, mutilated, and killed.
Defense of the poor sometimes prevails. In Colombia, South Carolina, a 14 year old girl stops a lynch mob from seizing a black prisoner, by holding a lynch mob at bay with a revolver she doesn’t even know how to shoot.
During World War II, in 1945, Executive Order 9066 was signed by President Franklin Roosevelt, which allowed 110,000 Japanese Americans were disarmed and sent to internment camps, or “War Relocation Centers.” Even Germans and Italian immigrants, and their American-born children were sent to camps or sent back to Europe. Two-Thirds of those put in concentration camps were U.S. citizens. In 1944, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the exclusion and detention law, arguing that it is permissible to curtail the civil rights of a racial group when there is a "pressing public necessity." The legislation stated that government actions were based on "race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership."
Americans should be super-cautious about gun control legislation and be critical off all the one-sided hype surrounding school shootings that propose banning guns. There are bills in Congress right now that would do that. I encourage you all to become vocal supporters of the second amendment to go to Gunowners of America website and keep informed about attempts to destroy the Constitution, http://www.gunowners.org.
“He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetuate it.” –Martin Luther King Jr.
Gun Control: Disarming Civilians and Making Them Defenseless
Case Studies: Middle America, New Orleans, On Commercial Airlines (9-11), Anytime, Anywhere
On October 16, 1991, in Killeen, Texas, Doctor Suzanne Brasha was at a coffee shop with her parents. She often carried a gun for self defense but today she left it in the car in the parking lot. It is illegal to keep a concealed firearm in her purse, and she was afraid of loosing her medical license if she was caught with it. All of a sudden, a man in a truck drove into the store, jumped out of the car, and started shooting customers. Suzanne falls on the ground, reaches for her purse until she remembers that her only means of self-defense is 100 feet away in her car. The police can’t come for endless minutes. She watches as her father and mother are gunned down as she scrambles out a window towards her car. Fifty-three people die.
One early morning, on August 23rd, 2000, the children of John and Tiffany Carpenter are at home sleeping. All five kids know how to shoot, but California Law (CA Penal Code 12035), requires that guns be locked away from children. Jessica, 14, enters the kitchen with her family and sisters in bed, where a half-naked stranger awaits her with a pitch fork. He barricades the doors and windows. He has cut the phone line.
Stalking down the hallway he begins stabbing 13 year old Anna in her bed. Ashley, 9, leaps and screams in the hallway, drawing the madman away, as Ashley screams and dies. The girls all think of the gun, but can’t use it to save their sisters or brother. The three oldest girls escape, rushing to a neighbor and plead for his rifle. The neighbor fears the government would take his gun away and says no. By the time the police arrive, Ashley is dead with 138 pitchfork wounds to her face, neck, and chest. Seven year old John William has 46 wounds and is dead.
During the devastating aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, Martial Law was declared and people’s guns were confiscated. Looting, crime sprees, murder, and rape occurred from citizen-turned-criminals towards thousands of innocent people. Sometimes the government just can’t protect you. Even with proper infrastructure on a normal day-to-day basis, it takes twenty minutes or more for police to show up. Actually, they only have a legal duty to show up after the crime and to report it. They are under no legal obligation to interfere or try to stop a crime. By the time they show up, the criminals already gone, your child kidnapped, or your house is robbed or your little sister or mother is raped or killed already. Good job being a parent. If you love your kids and your family, I hope you won’t rely on the government to protect you.
The supposed hijackers of the terrorist attacks of 9-11 used box cutters overtook the cockpits, crashed into three buildings, and killed 3,000 people, starting a war we can’t see ourselves out of. A few months before 9-11, a gun control law was passed, banning pilots on commercial airliners from having guns, which could have been used to protect passengers and to stop hijackings.
Once people accept being disarmed, they become surprisingly easy to control or kill. They surrender their weapons, but also their independence. When innocents are rendered so defenseless, the guilty can slaughter them with the most ordinary weapons; knives, clubs, pitchforks, or box cutters. All the above stories are true and there are many more like it. Be independent and protect yourself; “gun control” has not been proven to stop criminals, only to disarms the victims.
Endgame: The Blueprint For Global Enslavement
We need to face reality and realize when we are only able to make 2 choices - for or against national soverignty, for example - no matter what our idealistic perfect improbable utopian society is, it may be in our best interests to act against our dream society and work towards a world with less suffering and violence overall in the long-run.
We need to realize that by being indecisive or having no opinion, we have made that decision. Be not having the time to have done your research, you have made a decision that it is not your priority. When faced with the scope of potential suffering that we face, on a wide scale, in our lifetime, it is essential for the preservation of your own freedom and existence that you make it a priority to do the research, and foster an opinion. Otherwise, if this is all true, you could be just inviting disaster upon yourself, and your the only one to blame.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Quotes From The Most Evil Men Alive
Quotes From The Most Evil Men Alive - Kissinger and Rockefeller - and some others about how these two men, along with the Rothschild's admit to being in a secret cabal working towards an oppressive world government (or a "New World Order" as they call it)...
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
- Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991
"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."
- Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets
“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
- David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
- David Rockefeller
"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."
- Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, Time Magazine, July 20th, l992
We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans."
- Bill Clinton, USA Today on 3/11/93, page 2a
"For David Rockefeller, the Presidency of the United States would be a demotion." - The standard joke in America for a time in the 1970's, as quoted in Harr & Johnson The Rockefeller Conscience; An American Family in Public and in Private, 1991, (p.217).
"It is the system of nationalist individualism that has to go....We are living in the end of the sovereign states....In the great struggle to evoke a Westernized World Socialism, contemporary governments may vanish....Countless people...will hate the new world order....and will die protesting against it." - H.G. Wells, in his book, “The New World Order”, 1940
* "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." - In an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.
How do you deny these admissions of the most powerful people in the world that they want to create a oppressive world government?
OPPOSE THE NEW WORLD ORDER
Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement:
Myspace Censorship of Planned Ron Paul "Money Bomb" for December 16th
Myspace Censorship of Planned Ron Paul "Money Bomb" for December 16th
video evidence below
This past November 5th, supporters of Presidential Candidate organized a "Money Bomb" - or a mass donation day. From the power of the internet, within only two weeks, the idea spread like wildfire. On that day, hundreds of TV and Print media were forced to talk about Ron Paul, as 37,000 Ron Paul supporters donated a total of $4.3 million. Paul deposited more in a single day than any other Republican in history. The mainstream media was forced to admit Ron Paul as a top-tier candidate that was not being run by internet spammers.
When it comes to sums amassed in one day, Paul now ranks only behind Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton, who raised nearly $6.2 million on June 30. But that could all change.
The next mass donation day has been planned on December 16th; the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party. The website is www.teaparty07.org. The site already has almost as many supporters signed up to take part in relation to November 5th, with 30 days left to go as the site generates between two and three thousand new subscribers a day. At this pace, the site is on track to reaching it's stated goal of reaching 100,000 subscribers, who, donating $100 each, will raise $10,000,000 in a single day. In contrast, thisnovember5th.com had only 16,000 subscribers, but generated well over the average of $100 each, which would have been only $1.6 million, compared to the $4.2 million it actually raised. It is clear that not everyone who is going to donate even subscribes their pledge; and that many people donate well over $100.
For all those reasons, there is little doubt this day will make history as the largest political donation day in history - surpassing Hillary Clinton's $6.2 million raised on June 30th, and give Ron Paul the money he needs to to buy TV and radio ads to secure a win in the Republican Party Primaries.
But Fox News and Myspace are trying to stop that. Myspace.com is owned by Fox News which is run by Rupert Murdock. It has been widely reported by alternative and mainstream media that Murdock is practically "in love" with Hillary Clinton's Presidential bid.
The mainstream media is continuing to censor Ron Paul's success, like downplaying his winning 5 of the last 6 online Republican debates, not mentioning him winning most of the Republican Straw Polls, a Fox News anchor caught on tape saying to get the audience in the shot but not any of "those Ron Paul supporters," and more. It is important to point out that the following is not an isolated incident but must be part of a organized plan to quell a peaceful political revolution to take back this country from the hands of corporate interests and restore liberty and freedom to the people.
Here's a video showing evidence that Myspace is censoring bulletin posts regarding the word "December 16th" in relation to Ron Paul's next record-breaking mass donation day:
Monday, November 12, 2007
Tea Party 2007 - Spread the word!
Saturday, November 10, 2007
What Liberals Don’t Know About Illegal Immigration
What Liberals Don’t Know About Illegal Immigration
Watch these videos or read my article below to see the larger picture:
The Globalists are using a divide and conquer strategy to balkanize the United States. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) undoubtedly lowered the standard of living in Latin America, especially Mexico. The architects of the New World Order have been planning a world government for centuries, and through secret organizations such as the Bildberberg group, the Trilateral Commission, and the Council on Foreign Relations (all set up by the Rockefellers), they developed, funded, and pushed NAFTA and CAFTA throughout the 1990s. The agreements were sold to corporations and the public as a way to better the economies of the three countries by increasing trade (it did the opposite). Its key goal was cause a flood of unrestricted illegal immigration into the United States. That is why President Bush and the leaders of Mexico are happy leaving the borders wide open, and finding any excuse to arrest and indict border control officers or police anywhere in the U.S., who try to enforce our country’s immigration policy.
While the corporate-controlled media teaches Americans that pro-U.S. nationalism is xenophobic and racist, the very same media is busy teaching Mexicans that ultra-extreme race-based nationalism is good and part of their culture. The federal government, tax-free foundations, and the Fortune 500 have pumped more than $800 Billion into a long-term strategic plan to export Latin American revolution into the United States. The United States must be divided before it can be absorbed into the North American Union.
The planners of the world agenda plan their integrationist policies well in advance. The key objective of NAFTA was to lower the standards of living in Mexico to increase the flood of immigrants. As Americans rightfully object to immigrants stealing jobs and collecting welfare, sentiment grows. The Globalists are using “divide and conquer” as a long-term strategic plan for a police state and to integrate the three countries into a North American Union, which will be the pre-text for a world government.
The New World Order's social engineering has done a masterful job exploiting social divisions between the U.S. and Mexico. For 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, Spanish-speaking media drills it into their audiences’ heads: That the southwest, from California to Texas once belonged to Mexico and that the U.S. stole it in 1848. Every child in Mexico is taught from birth, and officially in school, that the United States is the arch-enemy of Mexico, and that it is their job to travel to the United States, to take part in a re-conquorering or La Reconquista of the United States.
Reconquista today refers to an explicit agenda of M.E.Ch.A. (Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan) to retake lands from the U.S. which once belonged to Mexico. This would include Texas, California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah and parts of Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma, all of which were ceded by Mexico under terms of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848.
The primary method for this 'reconquest' is demographic. By means of legal and illegal immigration from Mexico and Central America, and by means of high birthrates among non-White Hispanics, the non-non-White Hispanic population will be reduced to a minority which can be voted out of power and influence. While nominally nonviolent this will force African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Native-Americans and European-Americans out of what will be called Aztlan. Reconquista is not integrationist or assimilationist, but rather is separatist and explicitly racial. M.E.Ch.A.'s motto translates as, 'Everything for the race. Nothing outside the race.'
The Federal government, in the name of “keeping us all safe from each other,” would love to use something like this as an excuse to set up an incredibly powerful police state. I don’t want Hispanics looking at whites with fear, nor do I want whites looking at Hispanics with fear. We’re all human beings. What you need to understand is that empires have always used divide and conquer to manipulate.
The reconquista movement has big corporate funding. In almost every case, rich white men are behind the neo-Aztec movement. One businessman in California bought almost 700 signs telling the public that Los Angeles is now Mexico. This is an attempt to create false pride by which people can be easily steered.
A businessman in California bought almost 700 signs telling the public that Los Angeles is now Mexico. Who is behind this separatist “Reconquista” movement? What is their agenda?
Mexico has the greatest concentration of wealth per capita in the World. But Mexico's tiny elite rule against one of the poorest and most oppressed populations in the world. Mexico is exporting its impoverished and angry citizens to the United States, as a way to avoid internal revolution. The corrupt elite of Mexico tell their enslaved populations that all of their problems are caused by the United States.
The architects of the New World Order are using cheap slave goods and oceans of third world migrants to overrun the United States. The same oligarchs who have wrecked the third world are now framing the United States for their crimes, and using the rightfully enraged mob as a weapon on conquest.
The guest-worker amnesty plan being bush by President Bush is nothing more than a North American Union standardized ID card that erases all three nations’ independence. Spanish-speaking TV, radio, and print are on-fire with talk of revolution. Many stations bare the name "La Invasora" (The Invader).
Americans who don't speak Spanish are unaware of what is going on so that the corporate-controlled revolution can build in semi-secrecy. Most of the media outlets spewing the slogan, "Viva La Raza" (Long Live the race), are owned by New York and London-based companies that are cold-bloodedly pushing the breakup of the United States.
The government is pushing a double-standard in its treatment of citizens vs. its treatment of illegals. Citizens are arrested if they don't have insurance or drivers licenses; illegals are not. Illegal aliens do not need a valid form of identification to set up a bank account, or get a car loan, while citizens do. The government subsidizes the illegals via welfare; at tax-payer expense. This is not done to help the illegals, but to subsidize the large corporations that employ them, in an on-going war against the middle class.
Driving down the standard of living for the middle class is not only being done through subsidizing illegals with tax-payer money, or via the illegals taking millions of U.S. jobs for lower pay. The Federal Reserve destroys the value of the dollar, continually breaking the record every month for being at an all time low compared to the Euro or other currencies. The Federal Reserve, an offshore private corporation, now does not have to publish audits of how much money it prints into circulation. The purchasing power of our dollar is being destroyed as we are all told that inflation is only 3% when, calculated with energy and food, it is often well above 15% and growing. Even at 3%, prices double every 25 years.
Destroying the U.S. economy in this way is a plan to introduce and set up the “Amero”; a proposed shared currency in North America and eventually all of the Americas. After leaving office in 2006, Vicente Fox tours the U.S. calling for amnesty and American Integration, because he is a now a paid propaganda puppet of the New World Order. President Bush is pushing for amnesty in congress and refuses to protect our borders because he is a paid puppet of the New World Order. The President has already been meeting with the head of Canada and Mexico, announcing a “Security and Prosperity Partnership” which is nothing short of merging the three countries’ regulatory agencies, armies, and more. For access these documents that have been released under the Freedom Of Information Act, go to www.judicialwatch.org.
For those of you who have been duped into believing that unrestricted illegal immigration is a human rights issue (I was one of them), remember the phrase “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.”
From birth, all Mexicans are taught in schools that the United States is the enemy of Mexico, and the cause of all it’s problems. They are duped into pro-nationalist sentiment that is being used to end the United States of America.
Case Example of Double Standard: Immigrant Rally in Seattle, Washington.
Draw your attention to Seattle, Wa., during a march where tens of thousands of demonstrators took to the streets demanding amnesty for 30 million illegal aliens. Despite the fact that many of them were undocumented, they were afforded their first amendment right to speech and expression. Of course in Mexico, most demonstrations are broken up by the police force, firing machine guns into crowds killing people.
Taking over downtown Seattle while waving Mexican flags and screaming "La Raza" was not enough. The crowd demanded that police physically stop an American citizen from engaging in his silent protest. Stuck in traffic for hours, the citizen held up his middle finger to the crowd. The police did not arrest a protester who assaulted the driver through his sun-roof. The citizen complied with the police officers order to suppress his first amendment rights and stop flipping the bird. But under orders of a plain-clothed police officer, the police ripped the driver from his car, and although he was not resisting, they smashed his face into the ground while arresting him. The commanding officer claps and cheers along with a predominantly foreign mob of protesters, as the citizen is arrested.
A huge pool of blood lay on ground as they continually slammed his face into the ground with full force. The police did not stop the protesters as they bashed out his car window and kicked his car in plain view. "Now your bleeding punk, what's it like now bitch" exclaims the Hispanic criminal who assaulted the citizen through his sun roof.
That day, the Seattle police filled patty-wagons with American citizens who tried to peacefully picket the event. The New World Order allow free speech for illegals because they suit the agenda of the New World Order whose chief goal is to set up a North American Union as a stepping stone for a world government.
Backers of illegal immigration at a rally near Los Angeles took down an American flag at a U.S. post office, stamped on it and replaced it with a Mexican flag as police looked on, according to witnesses and a video of the event. Police officers in Maywood, Calif., Saturday eventually came to the pole to remove the flag but had bottles and rocks thrown at them. Mexican-owned businesses around the country are flying Mexican flags above the U.S. flag.
Friday, November 09, 2007
Loose Change Final Cut is Here
Loose Change: Final Cut Is Here
Ultimate version of the pre-eminent 9/11 truth documentary is released
Friday, Nov 9, 2007
Loose Change: Final Cut has arrived. Two days ahead of the original schedule, the long awaited final version of the film that took the 9/11 truth movement mainstream is now available to buy on DVD.
The original Loose Change and Loose Change 2nd Edition have been viewed at least 50 million times over the Internet, making it one of the most watched movies in history, but the Final Cut goes above and beyond, making it not simply the third in a trilogy but a completely new film with oodles of unseen footage, commentary, interviews and eyewitness testimony.
In an effort to be the catalyst for a new independent investigation of 9/11, the film features new and exclusive interviews with firefighters, EMT's, first responders and other officials who were all eyewitnesses to multiple secondary explosions in the twin towers and around the ground zero area.
Click here to order Loose Change Final Cut. View the official trailer below.
Part of the revenue from the sales will be donated to 9/11 victim's charities such as The Feal Good Foundation and WTC Families for Proper Burial.
The film will be subject to selected cinematic release in 2008, but many grassroots and selected theatres have already agreed to pick up the movie from December onwards across the U.S and Europe and the Loose Change team are encouraging activists to ask that their local theatre to screen the documentary.
Throughout the year Dylan Avery Jason Bermas and Corey Rowe, have been negotiating with various different producers in Hollywood in hope of securing a mainstream release. However, the team recently decided to forgo such a deal in order to retain full editorial control of the film.
"This just wasn't an option for us, as the integrity of our message is ultimately all that we have, and we feared that 'the machine' would corrupt or squash our film and its movement." an official statement read.
The trio are also extremely proud of the manner in which their initial release of the internet phenomenon documentary has spawned a move that has seen the release of scores of successful independent grassroots films. The team wish to continue to challenge the traditional marketing channels and reinvent the way that films are distributed.
Alex Jones worked with the trio in an executive producer role on the film and has partly financed it's production and distribution.
Other consultants on The Final Cut include Professor David Ray Griffin, author of three widely read studies of the 2001 attacks.
In the coming weeks and months we expect to witness the launch of a fresh wave of attacks against the 9/11 truth movement by neocon hacks such as Bill O'Reilly, who has regularly equated the movement with terrorists, a tactic that has since been echoed by other mainstream gatekeepers.
O'Reilly admits right off the bat that he has not even seen Loose Change, following in the trend of his fellow debunkers who have already arrived at a judgment without even checking the evidence. O'Reilly has made the argument that "Loose Change should be banned just as some books should be banned."
Orders are now being taken for the DVD which will be shipped out before the end of the month. The Film will be available for download in the coming days at PrisonPlanet.com, Infowars.com and LooseChange911.com.
Wednesday, November 07, 2007
Vegetarian Food for Thought
Learn some new (vegan) thanksgiving recipes!
Vegetarian Food for Thought is a "life-changing" podcast that leaves listeners feeling supported, motivated, and inspired. Celebrating a way of life that encompasses compassion for everyone, this podcast addresses all aspects of eating a compassionate, healthful, whole foods, plant-based diet and advocates a sustainable food system that supports organic, local, seasonal fare. Each episode addresses commonly asked questions about being vegetarian/vegan, including those regarding animal rights, food, cooking, nutrition, and debunks the myths surrounding these issues. Drawing upon poetry, short stories, and other forms of literature, this is a unique podcast that works on many levels.